stable branch
Jean Bruenn
jean.bruenn at ip-minds.de
Wed Mar 28 01:17:52 CEST 2012
I could do an installation, optimize it for i686, update and tar.gz it
- if that would help. Then you'd just need to unpack it :)
-
On Wed,
28 Mar 2012 00:58:25 +0200 "Duncan Gibson" <duncan.gibson at xs4all.nl>
wrote:
> > Some testers/devs willing to install lunar from iso (just the normal
> > installation, but before doing anything, lin moonbase; lin theedge
> > (make sure you switched to theedge, then make sure you selected the
> > "stable" branch, which should be the default anyway) and then
> > continue the usual update procedure - fix upcoming errors/problems
> > and if you got a bit more time, try an x11 installation.
> >
> > The current goal is to make the stable branch stable - as soon as we
> > reached that goal, we can push the change from theedge to lunar as
> > well.
>
> As mentioned on #lunar I have limited time at the moment but I can
> probably stretch to reinstalling a box from scratch and letting the
> update chug along in the background.
>
> But, what I think would really help, would be to have a more
> up-to-date ISO image, even if it's just an alpha, to avoid having to
> rebuild too much of the initial system every time while we iron out
> the wrinkles in the stable branch idea. Sure, building X11 will then
> still take time...
>
> D.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lunar-dev mailing list
> Lunar-dev at lunar-linux.org
> http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar-dev
--
Jean Bruenn <jean.bruenn at ip-minds.de>
More information about the Lunar-dev
mailing list