stable branch

[Drew Kelling]

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Jean Bruenn <jean.bruenn at ip-minds.de> wrote:
> I could do an installation, optimize it for i686, update and tar.gz it
> - if that would help. Then you'd just need to unpack it :)
>
>
> -
>
> On Wed,
> 28 Mar 2012 00:58:25 +0200 "Duncan Gibson" <duncan.gibson at xs4all.nl>
> wrote:
>
>> > Some testers/devs willing to install lunar from iso (just the normal
>> > installation, but before doing anything, lin moonbase; lin theedge
>> > (make sure you switched to theedge, then make sure you selected the
>> > "stable" branch, which should be the default anyway) and then
>> > continue the usual update procedure - fix upcoming errors/problems
>> > and if you got a bit more time, try an x11 installation.
>> >
>> > The current goal is to make the stable branch stable - as soon as we
>> > reached that goal, we can push the change from theedge to lunar as
>> > well.
>>
>> As mentioned on #lunar I have limited time at the moment but I can
>> probably stretch to reinstalling a box from scratch and letting the
>> update chug along in the background.
>>
>> But, what I think would really help, would be to have a more
>> up-to-date ISO image, even if it's just an alpha, to avoid having to
>> rebuild too much of the initial system every time while we iron out
>> the wrinkles in the stable branch idea. Sure, building X11 will then
>> still take time...
>>
>> D.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lunar-dev mailing list
>> Lunar-dev at lunar-linux.org
>> http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar-dev
>
>
> --
> Jean Bruenn <jean.bruenn at ip-minds.de>
> _______________________________________________
> Lunar-dev mailing list
> Lunar-dev at lunar-linux.org
> http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar-dev


An updated alpha img would be great!

I was wonder if we should start thinking about binary options such as
what WDP said to all users. I feel that a binary option would further
the growth of the project as a whole.