glibc update

[samuel]

as you can see, there was only one iso with X on it... consider it an
experiment. i don't think it will ever be repeated cause afaik it was
a lot of work to build the iso and with iso releases being as
infrequent as they are we can't really afford more delays ;)

On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 6:31 AM,  <rpyne at kinfolk.org> wrote:
> On 28 Sep 2008 at 1:53, Zbigniew Luszpinski wrote:
>
>> Sunday 28 of September 2008 01:06:10 rpyne at kinfolk.org wrote:
>> > My biggest objection to using the alpha ISO is that I don't want X
>> on
>> > the machines.
>>
>> Go to http://lunar-linux.org/ and read carefully the topic:
>> "1.6.4-alpha3 (i686 & x86-64) ISO released"
>>
>> if you did not read it before. I'm sure you did not.
>
> You are correct, I hadn't read the latest news about the new ISO.
> Thank you for bringing it to my attention.
>
> The top of the list of reasons I moved to Lunar several years ago was
> because of the philosophy of installing a bare minimum system and
> then giving the admin total control over what software and services
> were installed on the machine. To me, it is critical that this basic
> goal not change.
>
> --Richard
> _______________________________________________
> Lunar mailing list
> Lunar at lunar-linux.org
> http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar
>