glibc 2.6

[Moritz Heiber]

Glibc > 2.3.x requires our glibc module to be rewritten which is a very
difficult task. Its being worked on.

Regards,

Moritz

On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 14:01:36 +0200
Christian Riggenbach <criggenbach at magahugu.net> wrote:

> i just tried gcc 4.2.1 and wonder that it won't compile. i found out,
> that with glibc 2.6 it does. so i ask: is there a reason to stay on
> glibc 2.3.6?
> 
> i don't encounter any problems with glibc 2.6, but i don't specialy
> tested it, just compile about 10 programs.
>