udev58 and 1394 firewire stuff

[Jaime Buffery]

Hello,

>Jun  9 09:48:34 sidney ieee1394: raw1394: /dev/raw1394 device initialized
>Jun  9 09:48:38 sidney video1394: Installed video1394 module
>Jun 15 08:17:52 sidney ieee1394.agent[4175]: ... no drivers for IEEE1394
>product 0x/0x/0x

I still have no idea about firewire, but if there is no driver, why should there 
be a device node? Therefore, if there were a driver, wouldn't it create a node 
with default perms anyway, even if not listed in the rules file? 

Above all, sending the whole rules file is a big no-no. If you want to show 
firewire rules, just show firewire rules, not the whole file. Please, this must 
not happen again. It is not only useless info, but a use of BW that we didn't 
need.

Ciao,
nestu