ranitha at optusnet.com.au
Sat Nov 27 08:17:24 UTC 2004
Why do you insist on bootsplash over fbsplash/gensplash?!!?
The themes can be converted and the design seems to be a lot cleaner.
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 20:50 -0600, Woody Gilk wrote:
> i think i will use a vanilla kernel with a bootsplash patch for now.
> i'd like to integrate cko, but the incompatibilities are a bit too
> complex for me to figure out. after (if?) i get linux-2.6-bsp working,
> someone might want to figure out linux-2.6-ckob.
> right now i'm making sure i can get a vga/framebuffered console working. :P
> On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 07:29:39 +1100, Ranitha Mapatuna
> <ranitha at optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > Hey,
> > fbsplash and bootsplash are mutually exclusive AFAIK. If you really
> > want bootspash I think you might have to reverse patch fbsplash first.
> > Ranitha
> > On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 13:55 +0100, Bernd Kosmahl wrote:
> > > Am Freitag, 26. November 2004 08:51 tippselte Woody Gilk:
> > > > has anyone tried to get bootsplash ( http://www.bootsplash.org/ )
> > > > working? would it be possible to do a linux-2.6-ckob (cko +
> > > > bootsplash) kernel? i'm willing to try and get it working if there's
> > > > an interest...
> > >
> > > I'm interested :)
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lunar mailing list
> > Lunar at lunar-linux.org
> > http://lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar
More information about the Lunar