Sexyboy

[Dennis Veatch]

On Sunday 04 July 2004 01:25 pm, Jaime Buffery wrote:
> Hello, Dennis
>
> Sorry to answer twice, but I'm half asleep :\ I missed to answer you before:
> > Now a question about rebuilding and such now that Sexyboy defaults with
> > 2.6.6. As outlined in http://lunar-linux.org/?q=node/view/24 it specifies
> > the order packages should be rebuilt, does this still apply? Not knowing,
> > I decided to skip lunar rebuild. lunar update and jump straight to what
> > was outlined. What prompted me to do that was doing a lunar update.
> > Looking at what it wanted to update versus what's outlined, there is no
> > particular order things are updated. For example, kernel-headers was at
> > the bottom of the list. Yes, I know lunar update is not really capable of
> > sorting that type of thing out. It's just a note.
>
> If you read through what I wrote on the 2.6 kernel, you should notice that
> is how to pass from a 2.4 install to a 2.6 based install, recompiling all
> base stuff (the list supplied in the howto). The iso is not this case
> because it has already been compiled against 2.6 headers, so that step is
> unneeded. Just do a lunar renew or rebuild, like man lfirsttime says.
> That'll be fine. l8er,
> nestu ;)

Yes, didn't notice that.

Since there is a new kernel-headers version, should all those be redone?