Galeon2 & MozillaFirebird

[Terry Chan]

I totally agree with Nick Hudson.  Leave MozillaFirebird alone.

If you want other mozilla type features (like compiling galeon, or openldap,
etc.) then USE mozilla!!!

Terry Chan
------------------------------------------------------------
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:20:32PM -0500, Nick Hudson wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 15:47, Hendrik Visage wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:39:45PM -0500, Terry Chan wrote:
> > > Nick Hudson has previously modified MozillaFirebird to install in /opt,
> > > so there is NO conflict anymore with mozilla.
> > 
> > But you can use galeon2 against either... so a choice would then be needed
> > against which...
> > 
> To be honest yes you can do this, but to do this we will need some logic
> to be put into the module for the user to choose between the two.  Now
> some other dev can correct me if I am wrong here but we are trying to
> stear clear of logic being put into the modules and we are currenlt
> trying to take the logic we have in current modules and remove it.  Now
> if everyone wants to be able to compile galeon2 with MozillaFirebird
> then I will make it so, but until then I do not see a use in it.  
> 
> On a side note I tried compiling epiphany with MozillaFirebird and it
> didnt work, it died a horrible death during compile.  I assumed the same
> for galeon2 and being I do not have it installed I didnt test it
> anyway.  Anyway I dont mean to sound like a sourpuss but I just think we
> need to keep it the way it is, now like I said if everyopne wants to be
> able to compile galeon2 with Firebird I can do so.  Personally I dont
> see why though, you already have a "fast" browser installed why do you
> need another??
> 
> Nick