binutils

[Shern, Benjamin J]

Ack, the old "if all your friends jumped off a cliff, are you going to
also?" argument....
I always hated when my parents used to pull that.

Okay, how about -
Use libiberty from binutils because it defines "htab_create_alloc" and the
one
from gcc doesn't?   hehe

An optimal solution might be to look at making shared versions of these.
Ben



     > -----Original Message-----
     > From: Auke Kok [mailto:auke.kok at planet.nl] 
     > Sent: March 04, 2003 4:16 PM
     > To: Lunar Linux Mailing "List! (all are welcome)
     > Subject: RE: binutils
     > 
     > 
     > On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 00:00, Shern, Benjamin J wrote:
     > > I noticed this after upgrading gcc to 3.2.2.  I "believe" that
     > > libiberty.a from binutils is desired as this is what RH uses.
     > 
     > this has never been and never will be a convincing argument.
     > 
     > =^P
     > 
     > sofar
     > 
     > -- 
     > Auke Kok <auke.kok at planet.nl>
     > 
     > _______________________________________________
     > Lunar mailing list
     > Lunar at lunar-linux.org
     > http://lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar
     >