kernel 2.4.21 - probably best avoided

[Ralph Crongeyer]

Hi all,

I agree also.
I'm not a developer so my agreeing doesn't matter so much but I too would like 
to see the supermount patch added to the patchset also. I think that people 
using Lunar on either Laptops or Desktops would find this very useful.

Ralph

On Friday 27 June 2003 07:25 am, Horn Gábor wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I agree, and just have one question: could it be possible to add the
> supermount patch to the patchset? Or will it conflict anything currently
> in it? I think it's a nice useful patch for those who use lunar  as a
> desktop. I use this patch for mounths w/o any problem, and am happy w/
> it (i use a 2.4.20-ck6 atm which includes this).
>
> Url:
>
> http://members.optusnet.com.au/ckolivas/kernel/
>
> thx, hirisov
>
> > Lunar users may want to avoid updating the linux-stable,vanilla
> > versions from .20 to .21. .21 has quickly gained a reputation for
> > numerous instabilities and at least one memory leak. .22-pre2
> > is out and marcello seems clear that .22 will be correct and
> > available soon.
> >
> > I'm considering reverting the -stable module to the patched-.20
> > kernel unless anyone has objections.
> >
> > elaine
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lunar mailing list
> > Lunar at lunar-linux.org
> > http://lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lunar mailing list
> Lunar at lunar-linux.org
> http://lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar