init.d files

[Auke Kok]

On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 20:36, David Barron wrote:
> So it's not something that should be done globally?  That makes sense.
> 

because mostly you need both of them to be available, static for
building apps that require them to be there, ad dynamic in order to run
apps that link against them

we don't really even 'force' building both of them since most source
package writers know what we need and 'make isntall' already does that
for us.

sofar

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Mead [mailto:csm at MoonGroup.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:36 PM
> To: This is the primary mailing list for Lunar Linux!
> Subject: RE: init.d files
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, David Barron posted the following:
> 
> DB>cool!
> DB>I'm new to lunar so i'm not up-to-date with all the features.  Must say, though, so far I'm impressed.
> DB>
> DB>Which leads to another question.  I'm watching a compile and noticed that static and shared libraries are both being built.  Is there any partiular reason to do both?  Can I choose just shared somehow?
> 
> It depends on what it is... some things we chose to do it that way for
> good reason.
> 
> - -- 
> csm
> 
> I am not a curmudgeon! No... really...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE+OX6Ev6Gjsf2pQ0oRAvLbAKCXaSxdmwwr6C7ISKQZUCt0m5V9jACgj8JQ
> BfNOd+ZoMf7yTZtZttBC/50=
> =P4ZW
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Lunar mailing list
> Lunar at lunar-linux.org
> http://lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar
> _______________________________________________
> Lunar mailing list
> Lunar at lunar-linux.org
> http://lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar
-- 
Auke Kok <auke.kok at planet.nl>