init.d files
David Barron
David.Barron at sas.com
Thu Jan 30 14:36:42 GMT 2003
So it's not something that should be done globally? That makes sense.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Mead [mailto:csm at MoonGroup.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:36 PM
To: This is the primary mailing list for Lunar Linux!
Subject: RE: init.d files
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, David Barron posted the following:
DB>cool!
DB>I'm new to lunar so i'm not up-to-date with all the features. Must say, though, so far I'm impressed.
DB>
DB>Which leads to another question. I'm watching a compile and noticed that static and shared libraries are both being built. Is there any partiular reason to do both? Can I choose just shared somehow?
It depends on what it is... some things we chose to do it that way for
good reason.
- --
csm
I am not a curmudgeon! No... really...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+OX6Ev6Gjsf2pQ0oRAvLbAKCXaSxdmwwr6C7ISKQZUCt0m5V9jACgj8JQ
BfNOd+ZoMf7yTZtZttBC/50=
=P4ZW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Lunar mailing list
Lunar at lunar-linux.org
http://lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar
More information about the Lunar
mailing list