init.d files

David Barron David.Barron at sas.com
Thu Jan 30 14:36:42 GMT 2003


So it's not something that should be done globally?  That makes sense.


-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Mead [mailto:csm at MoonGroup.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:36 PM
To: This is the primary mailing list for Lunar Linux!
Subject: RE: init.d files


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, David Barron posted the following:

DB>cool!
DB>I'm new to lunar so i'm not up-to-date with all the features.  Must say, though, so far I'm impressed.
DB>
DB>Which leads to another question.  I'm watching a compile and noticed that static and shared libraries are both being built.  Is there any partiular reason to do both?  Can I choose just shared somehow?

It depends on what it is... some things we chose to do it that way for
good reason.

- -- 
csm

I am not a curmudgeon! No... really...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+OX6Ev6Gjsf2pQ0oRAvLbAKCXaSxdmwwr6C7ISKQZUCt0m5V9jACgj8JQ
BfNOd+ZoMf7yTZtZttBC/50=
=P4ZW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Lunar mailing list
Lunar at lunar-linux.org
http://lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar


More information about the Lunar mailing list