Module submission rar-bin
Shern, Benjamin J
ShernBJ at LOUISVILLE.STORTEK.COM
Mon Feb 10 10:03:12 GMT 2003
Hi,
Not a problem, just trying to contribute. My philosophy is use
the best tool for the job and leave licensing to the bean-counters...
Suppose Opera browser is out of the question then? =)
Here is another submission for WineX (Wine with DirectX support). I
believe the license is acceptable, but I haven't read all the fine
print (see philosophy above.)
Cheers,
Ben
PS: Let me know if you would rather I not e-mail module submissions,
That is OK too.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry Chan [mailto:tpchan at attbi.com]
> Sent: February 08, 2003 6:23 PM
> To: lunar at lunar-linux.org
> Subject: Re: Module submission rar-bin
>
>
> Ben,
>
> Your module submission for rar-bin, unfortunately, must be rejected.
>
> If you'll carefully read the license.txt that comes with
> rarlinux-3.1.1.tar.gz,
> you'll see that RAR is "try before you buy software". We don't allow
> any software in moonbase that has that license scheme.
>
> If you need unrar, that module has been in moonbase for quite
> a while and has
> a much more usable license, i.e. "freely distributed".
>
> Terry Chan
> _______________________________________________
> Lunar mailing list
> Lunar at lunar-linux.org
> http://lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar
>
-------------- next part --------------
z'µìmjÛZrܲÇ+¹¶ÞtÖ¦yh§yw/²Ö«o=ʦbq«b¢èrײÚÞjd¢ÍízÓòµëzÇ'¢Ö¯j)ZnW®Xm¶ÿu¸.ynªå{±¢¸?¦*^®f¢ùnªÿjÛZrÛ?ÛM7Ómtý§tÓg6ïõ¢åܾËZ®ã
More information about the Lunar
mailing list