New 2.6.0 naming

[elaine]

Keep the name, it's just a name, a rose by any other name 
still has thorns :-)

Technically, I doubt they're gonna start on 2.7 for awhile 
and even if they do I doubt it'll be usable in early iterations.


On kernels, I'd like to see some experimentation with snapshots
of glibc+nptl. NPTL was merged into glibc back in september and
is probably getting close to release.

I think the right time to release a new 'stable' 2.6 kernel into
moonbase is after we have a working & stable glibc+NPTL.

my $0.02 US

elaine



On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:43:55 +0100 (unchecked - local sync NTPstrat4)
nestu <nestu at lunar-linux.org> did inscribe thusly:

> Hello everyone,
> A quick question: what are we going to do with linux-beta? 
> are we going to stick with this naming, or should we switch? 
> I'd like to know if to bump the actual module, or if to 
> rename it. Now that it is the new stable version, I also do 
> not know if this has any affect on anything else further 
> than the kernel itself. Comments? Ideas?
> TIA,
> nestu ;))))
> -- 
> Lunar Linux		http://www.lunar-linux.org
> XFce Desktop		http://www.xfce.org
> #OnlyLinux LUG		http://www.onlylinux.no-ip.org
> 
> QOT?:
> <Veerappan> also, i'm upset.  my roommate's treadmill is too 
> short.
> <Veerappan> another foot, and my bike would fit :)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lunar-dev mailing list
> lunar-dev at lunar-linux.org
> http://dbguin.lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar-dev