Lunar-Linux ISO 1.7.0-dev
Jon South
striker at lunar-linux.org
Sat Jun 1 15:06:42 CEST 2013
I see no reason for xz to exist other than to require yet more utilities I
don't want, nor need. I won't accept my logs being in xz format either, so
that better be optional too. This isn't the 90's anymore with 28.8 modems
and 500MB drives. I don't understand why we're being turned into a hipster
distro... I haven't seen any other distro offering ISO's compressed with xz
either.
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Jean-Michel Bruenn
<jean.bruenn at ip-minds.de>wrote:
> I'd also prefer the iso in gzip and bzip2.
>
> On Sat, 1 Jun 2013
> 10:01:39 +0200 v4hn <v4hn at lunar-linux.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:21:43PM -0500, Jon South wrote:
> > > Why can't these be in sane formats like gzip or bzip2?
> >
> > Why do you consider xz not to be a sane format? It's
> > pretty standard nowadays (btw the lunar compile logs are
> > xz with the next version) and a fair amount smaller than
> > both of the others. (Also doppio is more or less full :))
> >
> >
> > v4hn
>
>
> --
> Jean-Michel Bruenn <jean.bruenn at ip-minds.de>
> _______________________________________________
> Lunar-dev mailing list
> Lunar-dev at lunar-linux.org
> http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://foo-projects.org/pipermail/lunar-dev/attachments/20130601/54560745/attachment.html>
More information about the Lunar-dev
mailing list