submission audacious.patch was rejected

[engelsman at lunar-linux.org]

Hi,

This mail is to notify you that your submission "audacious.patch" was
rejected after the following discussion on #lunar:

  engelsman | what's the feeling on brebs' audacious submission with
              all of the debian patches?
    Striker | depends on the nature of the patches
    Striker | does it require them?
  engelsman | haven't tried it yet but wondered whether it fitted with
              the Lunar idea of staying as close to the original source
              as possible
     Ratler | Imo any patch that actually do improve things should be added
    Striker | debian is not known for improving things
    Striker | they're known for backporting for the sake of backporting
     Ratler | hehe that's true, but at least take a look at the patches and
              see what they do. If it is cruft, just skip em
    Striker | it's disturbing that they're debian/patches/XXX
    Striker | i'd actually reject it
    Striker | the patches need to be explained what they do
     Ratler | Yea, and the part where he depend on their repo to download
              the source is just plain wrong too
    Striker | using a ton of patches simply because one or two contain
              bugfixes? dumb indeed
    Striker | plus, bugfixes should go upstream
    Striker | he even REMOVED the original source
    Striker | and replaced it with ubuntu's
    Striker | no, this needs to be rejected
     Ratler | yup i agree

Thank you for submitting updates to us!