[Fwd: Re: lunar-1.6.4-alpha3-x86_64.iso issues]

[v4hn]

ev'ning,

On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 07:24:37AM +0200, Stefan Wold wrote:
>-------- Forwarded Message --------
>From: Stefan Wold <ratler at lunar-linux.org>
>To: Dennis Veatch <dennisveatch at bellsouth.net>
>Subject: Re: lunar-1.6.4-alpha3-x86_64.iso issues
>Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 07:19:36 +0200
>
>[...]
>On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 20:14 -0400, Dennis Veatch wrote:
>>First. For the longest time the ISO has had reiserfs, XFS and/or JFS built 
>>into the kernel. The reason for the "and/or" on the last two items, I am not 
>>sure if one or both were built in. AFAICR, at least two of those were, and I 
>>am puzzled why they have been moved a module, and forcing a kernel recompile 
>>on the install to use them. I would really appreciate at least reiserfs 
>>returned to a built-in. I only bark about this because I have been using 
>>reiserfs for that past 4 years or so with lunar.
> 
>This is probably a misstake from my side, I'll fix this for the next
>release that should be a beta.

Some time ago there was a discussion in #lunar whether or not reiserfs should
be build in the kernel, when sofar played around with the kernel-config of the
iso. Well, he stated no one should use reiserfs anyway because ext3 is much
more appreciated, more stable, ...
Quite a lot of people disagreed, but well... sofar had spoken ;)
so it was left out until now.


v4hn
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://foo-projects.org/pipermail/lunar-dev/attachments/20080915/9efe7a23/attachment.bin