Change proposal to audacious/audacious-plugins

[Kok, Auke]

Jaime Buffery wrote:
> Hi, fellas
> 
> Coming from Auke's proposal to test audacious, I was rather astonished 
> by the fact that it had no audio output unless I had installed 
> audacious-plugins. 
> 
> The problem is audacious depends on audacious-plugins for output, but 
> the plugins cannot be installed without audacious. Sad but true.
> 
> IMHO, it is really weird that you have to install the plugins, as it
> currently is, in order to get the player.
> 
> So, we could:
> a ) create a dummy module that depends first on audacious and then
> on audacious-plugins.
> b ) Put both sources in one unique module called audacious-all, 
> just audacious or whatever you like.
> c ) Put a warning message on this issue at audacious' POST_INSTALL.
> c ) Leave it as it is.
> 
> I prefer the second approach. Okay, it isn't clean, but it works
> as expected, e.g. I install a player and I can play. No other
> module depends directly on audacious-plugins, so I don't see the 
> harm.

just put everything into ""audacious"".

Auke