[Fwd: Module submission - kernel-reqs]

Kok, Auke sofar at foo-projects.org
Mon Apr 23 18:11:45 CEST 2007


Zbigniew Luszpinski wrote:
> Monday 23 of April 2007 10:36:04 Jerry Lundström wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I have to raise this concern. Does the current kernel-reqs really work?
>> My point is that it doesn't since we force an update of that module via
>> the kernel modules after its compiled (not rebooted) the update will be
>> made for the old running kernel and not the new one.
> 
> AFAIR the iptables module used to be compiled against old kernels in the past.
> I fixed iptables on 13/02/2007 02:27 by sending patch to lunar group 
> (commited).
> http://foo-projects.org/pipermail/lunar/2007-February/007188.html
> This is the only one module I know which used to have such problem.
> If you found another module(s) with such problem please drop the module(s) 
> name(s) on Lunar ML. Will look around. Thanks for report.

yes, the idea is that all kernel-reqs module compile against `the latest 
lunar-installed kernel, even if not booted`. That comes down to compiling 
against /usr/src/linux in all cases.

these need to be fixed module per module if there are still broken ones out 
there. I have fixed a few, but don't use all of them of course. So please report.

Auke


More information about the Lunar-dev mailing list