Gnome 2.10

[Nick Hudson]

Greetings,

	The file structure looks great.  Having those three and maybe
gnome-extra would be fine.  Only problem I see is this, the SOURCE_URL
is pointing to the desktop releases.  This is fine but in the past they
tend not to update the desktop directories until a new release is made
and their might be 3-4 new versions out in between.  I would suggest
making the SOURCE_URL point to
$GNOME_URL/sources/$MODULE/base_version/ .  That way modules are easier
to update.  Other than that looks like the modules that use to depend on
hal and dbus no longer "depends" on them just uses them when they are
there.  Maybe one day someone can get hal and dbus to work correctly
with Lunar and life will be grand with Gnome 2.10.0.  Other than the
SOURCE_URL, everything looks great.

Nick  


On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 10:13 +0100, Jan Eidtmann wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 17.03.2005, 09:33 +0100 schrieb Jasper Huijsmans:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 09:15:32AM +0100, Jan Eidtmann wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > im currently working on 2.10 modules.
> > > I wanna discuss about the module structure.
> > > Currently the gnome modules are kinda confusing structured imo.
> > > im thinking about using the structure used on the gnome ftp:
> > > http://www.gnome.org/start/2.10/ (please scroll down to sources)
> > > 
> > > so we'll have three Gnome 2.x.x.x.x.x.x sections:
> > > 
> > > gnome-platform/ gnome-desktop/ gnome-bindings/
> > > 
> > 
> > That makes sense. Plus a gnome-apps or gnome-extras or something for GNOME
> > apps that are not part of any release set.
> 
> hmm, yeah, i think one gnome-extras/ section should do the trick.
> anyone?
> 
> gnome-platform/ and gnome-desktop/ is now in crater. please test and
> report problems to me. if nobody has scrupulosities (?) about the new
> structure and testing is finished we can merge 2.10 into the
> moonbase! :)
> 
> > 
> > 	Jasper
> 
> greetings and happy Gnome 2.10 testing,
> cmak
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lunar-dev mailing list
> Lunar-dev at lunar-linux.org
> http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar-dev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://foo-projects.org/mailman/private/lunar-dev/attachments/20050317/f9703d0a/attachment.bin