modutils and modulr-init-tools fix
Jasper Huijsmans
jasper at lunar-linux.org
Thu Sep 30 09:52:14 UTC 2004
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 11:06:05AM +0200, nestu wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have attached a first proposal for these two buggers.
> Basically what happens is that each module is placed in its
> own dir, and then the initscript on boot creates symlinks to
> the appropiate binary [ or man, you'll see ] depending on
> which kernel you booted with. These symlinks are created
> only for the overlapping installs.
>
Yeah, this sounds like a reasonable solution. Would it be possible to install
them as <prog>-2.4 and <prog>-2.6 instead of separate directories?
> A second proposal is to commit it to kernel/ instead of
> utils/, where it currently is.
>
Agreed, that is a better location.
> A third proposal is to create a modsymlinks module, and set
> a DEPENDS on it from m-i-t and modutils, but to be true I
> don't like much this idea, yet I don't like the attached too
> much either. *sigh*
>
Please, no.
Jasper
More information about the Lunar-dev
mailing list