[Lunar-bugs] [Lunar Linux 0000067]: unable to create software-RAID with 1.6.0
Lunar bug reports list
lunar-bugs at lunar-linux.org
Sat Jul 15 19:25:55 UTC 2006
The following issue has been RESOLVED.
======================================================================
http://bugs.lunar-linux.org/view.php?id=67
======================================================================
Reported By: remsys
Assigned To: sofar
======================================================================
Project: Lunar Linux
Issue ID: 67
Category: ISO
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: resolved
Moonbase Version: 20060131
Core Tools: Lunar
Core Tools Version: 20060129
Resolution: unable to reproduce
Fixed in Version:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 02-22-2006 11:35 UTC
Last Modified: 07-15-2006 19:25 UTC
======================================================================
Summary: unable to create software-RAID with 1.6.0
Description:
I can't get my machines to setup a software-RAID, not through the
installer, nor from the command line in a temporary shell.
Here's what goes wrong:
INSTALLER
=========
Partitioning:
-------------
The first thing that strikes me as odd is that I can's see /dev/hdc if I
try to partition my disks, although it's definitely there. So I have to
exit to a tempshell to partition /dev/hdc.
In regard to a software-RAID it would be nice/useful to have the
possibility to copy the partition-scheme of one drive to another.
Setup RAID:
-----------
First of all I'd like the installed to warn me if I'm not using FS-type fd
on the disks I'm trying to turn into an array.
Secondly the installer is unable to create and start a raid-device (i.e.
/dev/md0) if it already contains a superblock. it should use
--really-force or at least ask you if you'd like to do so.
If I try to start any other array than /dev/md0 (i.e. /dev/md1 having
members /dev/hda2 and /dev/hdc2, which have both been setup correctly) the
installer simply restarts all over again!
trying to setup&start all other arrays from the commandline in a
tempshell, as I have done many times before with the 2.4-based kernels,
doesn't work either, simply because there aren't any other /dev/md devices
than /dev/md0 -> /dev/md/0 (???????????). I haven't got a clue how to get
those, so I'll roll back to the 1.5.2 iso......
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sofar - 02-23-06 15:31
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The first thing that strikes me as odd is that I can's see /dev/hdc if I
try to
> partition my disks, although it's definitely there. So I have to exit to
a
> tempshell to partition /dev/hdc.
this was fixed in SVN already as reported on the ML.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sofar - 02-23-06 15:32
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> First of all I'd like the installed to warn me if I'm not using FS-type
fd on
> the disks I'm trying to turn into an array.
I'll consider this but it's not trivial to implement
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sofar - 02-23-06 15:34
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> If I try to start any other array than /dev/md0 (i.e. /dev/md1 having
members
> /dev/hda2 and /dev/hdc2, which have both been setup correctly) the
installer
> simply restarts all over again!
> trying to setup&start all other arrays from the commandline in a
tempshell, as
> I have done many times before with the 2.4-based kernels, doesn't work
either,
> simply because there aren't any other /dev/md devices than /dev/md0 ->
> /dev/md/0 (???????????). I haven't got a clue how to get those, so I'll
roll
> back to the 1.5.2 iso......
I can't reproduce this - the installer currently creates the /dev/md*
device nodes manually - I'll re-visit the code for testing for the next
release anyway, so this will get tested (again)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sofar - 02-23-06 15:36
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> the installer is unable to create and start a raid-device (i.e. /dev/md0)
if it
> already contains a superblock. it should use --really-force or at least
ask you
> if you'd like to do so.
I don't agree with this - I'm not going to help people destroy their data
;^)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
remsys - 02-23-06 18:27
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> If I try to start any other array than /dev/md0 (i.e. /dev/md1 having
members
>> /dev/hda2 and /dev/hdc2, which have both been setup correctly) the
installer
>> simply restarts all over again!
>> trying to setup&start all other arrays from the commandline in a
tempshell, as
>> I have done many times before with the 2.4-based kernels, doesn't work
either,
>> simply because there aren't any other /dev/md devices than /dev/md0 ->
>> /dev/md/0 (???????????). I haven't got a clue how to get those, so I'll
roll
>> back to the 1.5.2 iso......
> I can't reproduce this - the installer currently creates the /dev/md*
device
> nodes manually - I'll re-visit the code for testing for the next release
> anyway, so this will get tested (again)
Hmmm, it might have something to do with the fact that md1 (hda1+hdc1)
already contained a superblock as well(?). I wasn't able to figure that
out because of timepressure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
remsys - 02-23-06 18:31
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> the installer is unable to create and start a raid-device (i.e.
/dev/md0) if it
>> already contains a superblock. it should use --really-force or at least
ask you
>> if you'd like to do so.
> I don't agree with this - I'm not going to help people destroy their
data ;^)
hmmm, but it would be nice to be able to actually start the array from the
installer if you know what you are doing ("would you like me to force
recreation of this array and DESTROY THE DATA IN IT?"), especially for
people that don't know their way around in the installer.....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
remsys - 02-23-06 18:36
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> First of all I'd like the installed to warn me if I'm not using FS-type
fd on
>> the disks I'm trying to turn into an array.
> I'll consider this but it's not trivial to implement
couldn't you just 'fdisk -l | grep "Linux raid autodetect"' on the
partitions on the specified array-members?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
remsys - 02-23-06 18:41
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The first thing that strikes me as odd is that I can's see /dev/hdc if I
try to
>> partition my disks, although it's definitely there. So I have to exit
to a
>> tempshell to partition /dev/hdc.
> this was fixed in SVN already as reported on the ML.
Well, since bug 55 reports:
<quote>
Fixed in SVN. The fix will be available in rc2 and later releases.
</quote>
and this is rc3 I thought I'd mention it again, just to make sure the fix
gets into the final iso! I thought it might have something to do with the
fact that there's no /dev/hdb, just /dev/hda and /dev/hdc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sofar - 07-15-06 19:25
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not enough debugging information to work on this.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
02-22-06 11:35 remsys New Issue
02-22-06 11:35 remsys Moonbase Version => 20060131
02-22-06 11:35 remsys Core Tools => Lunar
02-22-06 11:35 remsys Core Tools Version => 20060129
02-23-06 15:31 sofar Note Added: 0000118
02-23-06 15:31 sofar Severity block => minor
02-23-06 15:32 sofar Note Added: 0000119
02-23-06 15:34 sofar Note Added: 0000120
02-23-06 15:36 sofar Note Added: 0000121
02-23-06 18:27 remsys Note Added: 0000122
02-23-06 18:31 remsys Note Added: 0000123
02-23-06 18:36 remsys Note Added: 0000124
02-23-06 18:41 remsys Note Added: 0000125
02-23-06 18:41 remsys Note Edited: 0000125
07-15-06 19:25 sofar Status assigned => resolved
07-15-06 19:25 sofar Resolution open => unable to
reproduce
07-15-06 19:25 sofar Note Added: 0000229
======================================================================
More information about the Lunar-bugs
mailing list