gtk+-2 module hunt for crasher
zbiggy at o2.pl
Sun Jan 2 21:50:37 CET 2011
> On Sunday 02 January 2011 9:33:05 am v4hn wrote:
> > I really _hate_ those buggy optimizations of gcc...
> > There are some known bugs in there for more then 3 years now.
> > Is there still no other free compiler, we could support
> > for module compilation?
> Is it really gcc or is it just gtk+-2? Not that gcc is perfect but I am
> inclined to think its gtk+-2.
100% sure gtk+-2 is badly written.
> > Thanks for investigating!
> > On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 02:47:51PM +0100, Zbigniew Luszpinski wrote:
> > > The fix (commited to moonbase - no date change so you have to lin
> > > it
> > >
> > > manually):
> > > # Fixes drag and drop crash
> > > bad_flags -O3 &&
> > > bad_flags -O2 &&
> > bad_flags -Os &&
> > should be in here as well, right?
I forgot about this one. My answer is: do not know/not tested.
-Os and -O2 use a little bit different set of flags.
I would start testing with -Os as it has all -O2 flags but some of them
are disabled (those from -O2 which can increase code size).
have a nice day,
More information about the Lunar