glibc 2.6

[Zbigniew Luszpinski]

Friday 03 of August 2007 14:01:36 Christian Riggenbach wrote:
> i just tried gcc 4.2.1 and wonder that it won't compile. i found out, that
> with glibc 2.6 it does. so i ask: is there a reason to stay on glibc 2.3.6?

I use glibc 2.5 which is fine (for modules I use). Glibc 2.6 broke during 
compilation (I do not remember if it was gcc 3.4 or 4.1) so maybe it requires 
gcc 4.2.1.  They may depend on each other :-)

AFAIK glibc 2.6.1 is current now.

BTW: I use since a year or more binutils 2.17, why not use it in moonbase?
binutils works nice with gcc 3.4/4.1

zbiggy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://foo-projects.org/pipermail/lunar/attachments/20070803/9e889745/attachment.bin