Module submission - NVIDIA

[samuel verstraete]

Talked about this with Moe...
To our knowledge 7.1 is just as good as 7.0 and could as well replace
it in the zbeta section.
Replacing XOrg with XOrg7 does sound like a bad idea to both of us. I
guess in time we'll have to do such thing but i rather see that new
boxes are installed with the XOrg7 than really break old working
versions of X...

gr,S.

On 8/25/06, Samuel Verstraete <samuel.verstraete at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> to my knowledge there are no dependency problems with xorg an sich...
> the only problems that you could have is dependency problems with other
> modules...
> but they are kind of hard to fix if we keep the old XOrg there... The
> only solution would be to add *all* xorg modules to the default
> profile...
>
> gr,S
>
>
>  On Fri, 25 Aug 2006
> 14:20:37 +0200 Zbigniew Luszpinski <zbiggy at o2.pl> wrote:
>
> >
> > > The 7.1 tree is completely ready for releasing in crater... Of
> > > course there is still the fixing of the dependency problem.
> >
> > OK. I have XOrg 7.1 working now (module taken from wiki). X opens
> > with few bash console windows (no desktop manager yet).
> > I did not find any dependency problem yet. But installing
> > xscreensaver (mentioned by sofar) tells me that XOrg7 has no DETAILS
> > file and refuses to build. I checked XOrg7 directory and there is
> > DETAILS file and all looks correct (I took files from profile
> > subdirectory). Is this is this 'dependency bug' to fight with or I
> > have done something wrong?
> >
> > have a nice day,
> > zbiggy
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Lunar mailing list
> Lunar at lunar-linux.org
> http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar
>