Which optimization for x86-64

[Jon South]

Dennis Veatch wrote:
> On Friday 13 May 2005 9:10 am, Moritz Heiber wrote:
> 
>>On Fri, 13 May 2005 08:34:31 -0400
>>
>>Dennis Veatch <dveatch at woh.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Ok, tried that and relined gcc. The lin failed before it got to the
>>>point of recompiling gcc with "badvalue (athon64) for march and mcpu".
>>
>>It should be 'Athlon64' or 'athlon64' .. not athon64.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Moritz

It should also be noted that by using those opts, it's still only going
to be 32 bit. To force compiling 64 bit requires -m64 -- but that wont
do you any good with a 32 bit kernel... At the moment, it's not worth
the effort to try and compile 64 bit apps until we get a 64 bit ISO
going for it, and even then, it will take some effort to create and to
maintain.

-Striker

-- 
The system requirements said "Windows 95 or better"
So I installed Linux.

Microsoft sells you Windows; Linux gives you the house.

v2sw6CUhw5ln4pr5$FPck4ma6/7u8LFw5TXm5l8O$i5e5+7t4TMNSDRAVXb3HOTen6g8+9ZASHCMPa22s6SMr2p6/7
www.hackerkey.com

Registered Linux User: 332618
<http://striker.interhact.net/striker.asc>