Why it takes so long to include modules in moonbase

[Zbigniew Łuszpiński]

> Zbigniew Łuszpiński wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Thanks for including in moonbase the libksba - module I sent on Tue May
> > 17. Could you tell me how to understand dates in modules?
> >
> > I sent updated libksba module on Tue May 17 2005.
> > The internal caption I made was UPDATED=20050516 and
> > DETAILS file had the same date.
> > Now, in moonbase the internal caption is UPDATED=20050525
> > and DETAILS file date is 20050526.
> >
> > How contributors should fill UPDATED= field?
> > Why including working module takes so long?
>
> we currently have not enough developers with time to review user
> submissions and sign them off and commit them. This means that modules
> that are not considered "interesting" get a lower priority and do not
> get committed to moonbase within weeks, sometimes not even alltogether.

OK. Can I help you with offloading queue? I will try to find any way to resolve this issue.

> If you want to speed up your submission, use the 'lvu edit' and 'lvu
> submit' code, which provides us with an easier way to merge your changes.
> It also makes sure that we don't have to do the same editing again.

I had problems with lvu submit. My lunar postfix was rejected because it is not known mail server. But emulated its behavoiur using e-mail client. Have to reconfigure it.

> Your submissions are in the TODO box. if you wish to resubmit them using
> 'lvu submit' then please do, it will help.

No. I do not want to enlarge queue by double posting. You better know what to include first.

> sofar

greets,
zbiggy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://foo-projects.org/pipermail/lunar/attachments/20050601/723b2199/attachment.bin