Mandatory format for doc's!

[Chuck Mead]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

elaine wrote:
| I'm sorry, while it happens that I don't have a whole lot of time for
| lunar right now and therefor this isn't going to impact anything much.
|
| I absolutely refuse to deal with a 'mandatory' re-direction of consensus
| already discussed with consensus sent to the list. The moreso given that
| it's been asserted that we cannot 'mandate' a level of quality / testing
| in the actual code we produce.
|
| The content here is not the issue, as it happens I agree that docbook is
| the better format. The issue is a. edict vs consensus; b. consistency.
|
| So I'll be passing on working on the documentation for now.

Well after further discussion on the irc channel I have basically given
up on trying to organize this effort. I can herd cats when I have the
time. Right now I don't...

At this juncture I guess people can just figure it out and if the
process is twice (or greater) as hard as it needs to be then so be it.


- --
csm
Lunar Linux Project Lead
Disclaimer: "I am not a curmudgeon! No... really..."
Addendum: "Bwahahaha! Fire up the orbital mind-control lasers!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAZzDBq3bny/5+GAcRAlZkAJ4k6j+e8Pz/XClVstU4WsFhDuR66ACeMORN
8ItwNyms/efH1Q5C1dW8gW8=
=8fEk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----