binutils

[Shern, Benjamin J]

I noticed this after upgrading gcc to 3.2.2.  I "believe" that
libiberty.a from binutils is desired as this is what RH uses.
Ben


     > -----Original Message-----
     > From: Auke Kok [mailto:auke.kok at planet.nl] 
     > Sent: March 04, 2003 3:59 PM
     > To: Lunar Linux Mailing "List! (all are welcome)
     > Subject: Re:
     > 
     > 
     > On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 23:50, Shern, Benjamin J wrote:
     > > Running into build problems with gcl.  Looks like 
     > there are multiple
     > > versions of libiberty.a being build by gcc, binutils, 
     > and gdb that are
     > > stepping on each other.
     > 
     > root at sofar ~ # lvu from libiberty
     > binutils-2.13.2.1:/usr/lib/libiberty.a
     > gcc-3.2.2:/usr/lib/libiberty.a
     > gdb-5.3:/usr/lib/libiberty.a
     > 
     > thou art correct!
     > 
     > anyone with ideas? is libiberty optional for these 
     > packages so we can
     > build it only in one of them?
     > 
     > sofar
     > 
     > -- 
     > Auke Kok <auke.kok at planet.nl>
     > 
     > _______________________________________________
     > Lunar mailing list
     > Lunar at lunar-linux.org
     > http://lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar
     >