Shern, Benjamin J
ShernBJ at LOUISVILLE.STORTEK.COM
Tue Mar 4 16:00:24 GMT 2003
I noticed this after upgrading gcc to 3.2.2. I "believe" that
libiberty.a from binutils is desired as this is what RH uses.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Auke Kok [mailto:auke.kok at planet.nl]
> Sent: March 04, 2003 3:59 PM
> To: Lunar Linux Mailing "List! (all are welcome)
> Subject: Re:
> On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 23:50, Shern, Benjamin J wrote:
> > Running into build problems with gcl. Looks like
> there are multiple
> > versions of libiberty.a being build by gcc, binutils,
> and gdb that are
> > stepping on each other.
> root at sofar ~ # lvu from libiberty
> thou art correct!
> anyone with ideas? is libiberty optional for these
> packages so we can
> build it only in one of them?
> Auke Kok <auke.kok at planet.nl>
> Lunar mailing list
> Lunar at lunar-linux.org
More information about the Lunar