openMotif vs. lesstif

[Victor Pelt]

if openMotif is prefered, why is alliance dependent on lesstif
if lesstif really is needed, does lunar place lesstif in a place
that is compattible with openmotif?


On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 21:57, Steven Michalske wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> if i rember properly lestiff was only for flash compatibility in konquror
> 
> and that is no longer the story as konquror works fine with openmotif
> 
> unless there was something else i think we can switch the depends of lesstif 
> to openmotif
> 
> perhaps you ben may want to try that
> 
> hardkrash
> 
> 
> 
> On Monday 17 February 2003 10:33 pm, Terry Chan wrote:
> > Ben,
> >
> > Unfortunately openMotif and lesstif are in direct conflict with each other
> > for include headers and library names.  The Lunar KDE devs/users say that
> > KDE still needs/uses lesstif, while we've been trying to get the rest of
> > moonbase over to openMotif.  openMotif is by definition "more" compatible
> > than lesstif to the Motif standard.
> >
> > If RH8 has figured out some way to "store" lesstif in an out-of-the-way
> > place, then the Lunar KDE devs should take a look at attempting to do that
> > as well.
> >
> > I try very hard to stay away from all things KDE, qt, and lesstif.  :-)
> >
> > Terry Chan
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lunar mailing list
> > Lunar at lunar-linux.org
> > http://lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE+Ua8kJhwOdxS4dYERAsXWAJ9NbujJaPV/rLKIWnVf9OuJP66DHgCgjWC9
> BZWg5a7KvCee8pgY2iXGyAk=
> =108j
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lunar mailing list
> Lunar at lunar-linux.org
> http://lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar
-- 
Victor Pelt <peltco at mail.utexas.edu>