Hardened Lunar Linux

[Jean Michel Bruenn]

heh. forgotten to answer on something:

> 1) security reasons (better control of system by having knowledge and tools to 
> gather status of modules installed (hardened/not hardened). In security 
> enhanced system non-hardened modules are not welcome and probably sysadmin 
> will would like to scan installed modules list for the items not meeting this 
> requirement (to find possible weaknesses/holes). Maybe download via https or 
> secure ftp from secured server over encrypted connection would be another 
> argument for separate moonbase-hd file.

Another thing (PERHAPS) could be, that we don't want every module in an
hardened moonbase. For example: Normal Moonbase is user friendly. Mostly
used for Desktop environments. A Hardened Moonbase wouldn't be as user
friendly as it now is. And it would be for ppl who wants a secured system.
The Question is, is it possible to say a secured system is a server-system?
If yes - we wouldn't need xmms or audacity or ... you know what i mean.
some modules or packages are useless on a server-system. The Question is
should it be a moonbase with every module from the original moonbase, or
simply a moonbase for server users.

cheers, jean