gcc-4.1.1

[samuel verstraete]

I was wrong... R b0rked :)

On 1/27/07, samuel verstraete <samuel.verstraete at gmail.com> wrote:
> i just lin -w 4.1.1 gcc
> and i had no problems at all with running any binary that was compiled
> with 3.4.6 .
> Is that clear enough?
>
> I upgraded now two boxes already and stillnone of them b0rked.
>
> cheers,S.
>
>
>
> On 1/27/07, Jan Eidtmann <cmak at lunar-linux.org> wrote:
> > On 27.01.07, Moritz Heiber wrote:
> > > On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:37:15 +0100
> > > Jan Eidtmann <cmak at lunar-linux.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > which where compiled with gcc 3.4.6?
> > > > when you say "the update" did that just involve the lin -w
> > > > 4.1.1 gcc part, or anything else? :>
> > >
> > > God cmak, I'm telling you right now: ITS SAFE, okay?
> > >
> > > Jesus!
> >
> > im not sure about that...why dont you just answer my
> > question? i shouldnt have used the ":>" i guess. it looks
> > like its saying "gotcha, and you know that". but what it
> > really sais is "please help, please waste your time for me,
> > please hmmkay, im clueless"
> >
> >  ///
> > cmak
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lunar-dev mailing list
> > Lunar-dev at lunar-linux.org
> > http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar-dev
> >
>