64bit iso

[Samuel Verstraete]

On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 07:32:10 -0800
Auke Kok <sofar at foo-projects.org> wrote:

> Samuel Verstraete wrote:
> > Sofar,
> > 
> > Is there any valid reason to have the lib64 > lib symlink ? I'm
> > trying to solve the NVIDIA binary driver of 64 bit but that symlink
> > seems to be a real pain. So how necessary is this? Who told you to
> > have it? Any documentation on this?
> 
> the current system is not able to handle multilib, and NVIDIA does
> not support a non-multilib setup. That's nvidia's problem, not mine,
> it is trivially simple for them to make it work, but not for me.

That was absolutely not the question... I just wanna know why it is
there... i don't want you to create a multilib version... i wanna know
why the symlink is there, as that is what the nvidia devs are asking me
and i have absolutely no idea what it is doing there...

> 
> As I said before, making a multilib 64/32-bit lunar setup is a bit
> more work than just snap your fingers. Feel free to try to change it
> yourself and see how it works without the symlink etc.
> 
> Auke
> _______________________________________________
> Lunar-dev mailing list
> Lunar-dev at lunar-linux.org
> http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar-dev