hal

[Steven Michalske]

Perhaps a better method for checking if the sedit needs to be applied???


On Jan 16, 2006, at 1:55 PM, sofar wrote:

>
>
>
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:52:52 -0500, Dennis Veatch  
> <dveatch at woh.rr.com> wrote:
>> On Monday 16 January 2006 03:31, samuel verstraete wrote:
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> I didn't want to screw with the hal module... i hardly understand
>>> anything about it...
>>> This morning i had to rebuild hal (due to the expat stuff) and it
>>> failed to build... again with that dvd_rw stuff.
>>> I checked the BUILD file and i commented the stuff about
>>> module_installed kernel-headers-2.6... and hal builds again...
>>>
>>> no idea what is going with this thing... i have the kernel-headers
>>> installed still it builds without the sedit line...
>>>
>>> Anyone care to explain why this line is there?
>>>
>>> $ lvu installed kernel-headers-2.6
>>> 2.6.12.0-i386
>>>
>>> so it concerns these 3 lines...
>>>
>>>     if module_installed kernel-headers-2.6; then
>>>         sedit "s:SG_FLAG_LUN_:SG_FLAG_UNUSED_LUN_:"
>>>  hald/linux2/probing/linux_dvd_rw_utils.c fi  &&
>>>
>>>
>>> gr,S.
>>
>> I dunno why that's there and have done the samething as you to get  
>> hal to
>> build on 2.6. Maybe it's supposed to be 2.4 headers instead? Dunno  
>> about
>> that
>> either cause I haven't run a 2.4 kernel for ages. Well, except for  
>> initial
>> install with the older ISOs but quickly move over to 2.6.
>
> hal is 2.6-kernels only - the sedit (afaics) was added because  
> something is different in the (vanilla) kernel-headers and the  
> "kernel-headers-2.6" headers. Might wanna verify if this is still  
> the same.
>
> Auke
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lunar-dev mailing list
> Lunar-dev at lunar-linux.org
> http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar-dev