openssl-0.9.8

Auke Kok sofar at lunar-linux.org
Wed Jul 6 10:22:24 UTC 2005


Auke Kok wrote:

>Auke Kok wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Terry Chan wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>When testing the new version of openssl-0.9.8, it seems to break quite a few
>>>apps in moonbase because of hidden depends on openssl existing in moonbase.
>>>
>>>I had to hack the openssl module to temporarily add symlinks for:
>>>
>>>/usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 -> libcrypto.so.0.9.8
>>>/usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7 -> libssl.so.0.9.8
>>>
>>>This is less than ideal.  If someone else has a better idea on how to fix
>>>this problem of version bumping openssl from 0.9.7g to 0.9.8, feel free to
>>>fix it in moonbase.
>>>
>>>I have NOT bumped the version of openssl to 0.9.8, in moonbase.
>>>
>>>Once all the hidden apps have been recompiled with the new openssl, they
>>>seem to work fine with libcrypto.so.0.9.8 and libssl.so.0.9.8.
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>this is an ever re-occuring problem with only one answer: you have to 
>>recompile all modules that (somehow) depend on openssl. The only 
>>solution I see for openssl is:
>>
>>1) bump the module but do not do anything specific after
>>2) send out an announcement prior with instructions and a code snipplet 
>>that shows you how to rebuild the required apllications, or otherwise 
>>use 'lunar fix' to autodetect and rebuild based on broken symlinks 
>>(ldd_check catches these).
>>
>>anything other is futile IMO
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>possible code for 2) would be:
>
>b) "lunar fix"
>a) for M in $(lsh list_installed) ; do ( lsh plugin_module_check_ldd $M 
>; [ $? == 2 ] && lin -c $M ; ) ; done
>

that's wrong of course, and should be:

for M in $(lsh list_installed) ; do ( lsh plugin_module_check_ldd $M 
; [ $? == 1 ] && lin -c $M ; ) ; done





More information about the Lunar-dev mailing list