kernel-headers-2.4 module

[Jaime Buffery]

On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 02:22:32PM +0100, Jasper Huijsmans wrote:
> > (not to even get to the part what happens when you're actually using
> > 2.6.x).
You mean 2.6.X w/ using kernel-headers-2.6?
 
> > So, I'd vote for either:
> > 
> > a) Go for symlinks again. Symlinks that are pointing to the right
> > location for the headers inside the kernel source tree. We could still
> > keep the kernel-headers-2.4 module .. but just turn it into a
> > "do-symlinks"-sort of module.
> > 
> > or
> > 
> > b) Make up a "real" kernel-headers-2.4 module instead .. which means to
> > keep the wrapped up kernel headers in a tarball on our mirrors.
> > 
> > So .. it's either a) or b). If somebody can point me to c) .. go for it.
> > 
> 
> I would choose (b).
 ditto 

> (c) could be to use redhat (or debian or suse or ...) 2.4 kernel headers,
> which have been 'sanitized', like the 2.6 headers. Don't know if that is
> needed or if it is available at all.
Debian uses 2.5.X headers in Sid (dunno if they are used in Sarge and Woody)

Ciao,
Jaime ;)