util-linux-2.12e
nestu
nestu at lunar-linux.org
Mon Sep 20 19:27:32 UTC 2004
Hello everyone,
I just thought you may just find this interesting (sorry, a
little long). This came to me as a fwd from a LFS list.
<paste>
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: OOM & [OT] util-linux-2.12e
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:05:02 +0200 (MEST)
From: <Andries.Brouwer at cwi.nl>
To: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
Just released (on ftp.win.tue.nl in
/pub/linux-local/utils/util-linux)
util-linux-2.12e.
The reason for this release were complaints that mount and
umount
OOM the kernel when the number of mounts is large.
And indeed - I tried with 30000 mounts and the OOM-killer killed
everything in sight, including X's console, making X exit,
killing
all remaining processes.
The new versions have been polished a little bit so as not
to waste
too much memory, and now survive the 30000 mount/umount test
for me.
Further polishing is needed for the case of large numbers of
mounts;
when /etc/mtab is not a symlink to /proc/mounts then umount
-a has
quadratic behaviour (it updates mtab after each unmount) and
that
gets terribly slow.
About OOM: I am still of the opinion that the default state
of the
kernel must be one where OOM does not occur and malloc()
tells us
that we are out of memory. A system that suddenly decides to
kill
all processes is really very poor and unreliable.
Users can enable other behaviours if they don't care about
reliability.
About mount: I wondered whether I should rewrite [u]mounts's
handling
of /etc/mtab so as to be a bit faster. But it seems a waste
of time -
/proc/mounts has many advantages: automatically up-to-date,
correct
also when namespaces are used, much faster. On the other
hand, /etc/mtab
contains mount options that are sometimes needed later.
If it were possible to store the mount options in the
kernel, making
them visible in /proc/mounts, then we could forget /etc/mtab
altogether.
People have asked repeatedly for a way to mark lines in
/etc/fstab
so as to make clear that such lines are managed by some GUI
or other
external program. Labels like "kudzu".
In this release I added a comment convention for /etc/fstab:
options
can have a part starting with \; - that part is ignored by mount
but can be used by other programs managing fstab.
If we would put the mount options in /proc/mounts, and
introduced
a comment convention (say, the part starting with \: is
ignored by
the kernel but can be used by programs reading /proc/mounts),
then /etc/mtab can die. Comments? Better solutions?
About util-linux and stuff: I have maintained various packages
for ten years or so - it may be time to pass things on to
someone else.
Write to aeb at cwi.nl if you are interested in taking over or
co-maintaining kbd or man or man-pages or util-linux.
Andries
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
</paste>
Ciao,
nestu ;)
--
Lunar Linux http://www.lunar-linux.org
XFce Desktop http://www.xfce.org
#OnlyLinux LUG http://onlylinux.no-ip.org
QOTD:
<Fuzzbox> "Lunar dev looking for a pretty girl to show her
the stars"
QOT?:
<Veerappan> also, i'm upset. my roommate's treadmill is too
short.
<Veerappan> another foot, and my bike would fit :)
More information about the Lunar-dev
mailing list