udev support

[nestu]

Jasper Huijsmans wrote:
> Long time ago, when it became clear there was no real buy-in for the new 
> initscripts, except from me, csm and you ;-)
Bleh. Meanwhile I have had a look at new LFS' initscripts. 
And I like them *a lot*... They are well chopped up, not 
like the big rc.sysinit our initscript module had...

> Also, my old computer melted, so I have a new one with a fresh install 
> (no I didn't test your 2.6 iso ;-).
Spoil sport! You won't get all the goodies then! :P I am 
working on the udev iso right now, though it doesn't pass 
the initrd, but I already know why. It has happened 
before... Fixable, but boring :)

I will send the udev files tomorrow, in the end. I'm not in 
the mood of swapping my box to udev from a static dev right 
now, since I have the initscript module installed. Most 
prolly it'd be a quite harmless swap (I have the 
pre-initscripts /etc backed-up) but I don't want to risk. 
That is why I want the udev iso ASAP (qemu rlz), so I can 
test without worrying about fscking up anything -I'm not at 
home, so I can't test on the other box... Sorry for the 
delay. Whatever happens, I'll mail a report tomorrow ;)

>     Jasper
Thanks for the reply ;)
CU,
nestu ;)))

-- 
Lunar Linux		http://www.lunar-linux.org
XFce Desktop		http://www.xfce.org
#OnlyLinux LUG		http://onlylinux.no-ip.org

QOTD:
<Fuzzbox> "Lunar dev looking for a pretty girl to show her 
the stars"

QOT?:
<Veerappan> also, i'm upset.  my roommate's treadmill is too 
short.
<Veerappan> another foot, and my bike would fit :)