New 2.6.0 naming

[ratler at lunar-linux.org]

Maybe we should change the naming scheme for our kernels. For 2.4 will be
default untill we consider 2.6 stable enough to use in lunar.
We probably want both kernel 2.4 and 2.6 to coexist for a while in
moonbase. So for now linux will stay 2.4 linux-grsec and so on as well.

Currently for 2.6 maybe name them linux26  linux26-grsec etc etc.
When we are ready to put 2.6 as default we simple rename lunar too
lunar24, lunar24-grsec and so on and rename linux26 to linux.

Did that make any sense at all? ;)

/Stefan Wold

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, nestu wrote:

> Hello everyone,
> A quick question: what are we going to do with linux-beta?
> are we going to stick with this naming, or should we switch?
> I'd like to know if to bump the actual module, or if to
> rename it. Now that it is the new stable version, I also do
> not know if this has any affect on anything else further
> than the kernel itself. Comments? Ideas?
> TIA,
> nestu ;))))
> --
> Lunar Linux		http://www.lunar-linux.org
> XFce Desktop		http://www.xfce.org
> #OnlyLinux LUG		http://www.onlylinux.no-ip.org
>
> QOT?:
> <Veerappan> also, i'm upset.  my roommate's treadmill is too
> short.
> <Veerappan> another foot, and my bike would fit :)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lunar-dev mailing list
> lunar-dev at lunar-linux.org
> http://dbguin.lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/lunar-dev
>