food for thought (and discussion)

[Steven Michalske]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 02 April 2003 2:25 am, Auke Kok wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I'm kinda in doubt what to do with earthbase... To be honest I really
> don't see any use in maintaining another set of packages and I hate to
> see Dem waste his time on it. Though I appreaciate any effort made, I
> think we should realize:
>
>      moonbase has been and is intended to be "stable"
>
> If we collectively want to step off this scheme and support two
> moonbases, I think a lot more needs to be done then support it in code.
> Besides that I think that lunar cannot support two moonbases right now
> as it is, we need more developers for that.
>
> If any of you has some strategic thoughts about this, please discuss
> them for me, I will happily change my thoughts if convinced ;^)
>
> sofar


i disagree that the earthbase is a bad idea,  if it is kept as a stable tree 
of the moonbase and say updated monthly, or big stable packages
we gould get the people willing to use it to test it for us.

hardkrash
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+ixTRJhwOdxS4dYERAo1qAJ9ROBUt80dDERXJnPyLcKYRwSfYewCeJPTx
9R2GuKJsfHL3pAEWWKSfQhY=
=kFmY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----